data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72697/726973876b01628c86a420f8317caf74b7176ba0" alt="Webroot vs kaspersky 2017"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4899d/4899d3a146238ea6578d99e2613728c18ea534ed" alt="webroot vs kaspersky 2017 webroot vs kaspersky 2017"
- #Webroot vs kaspersky 2017 install
- #Webroot vs kaspersky 2017 full
- #Webroot vs kaspersky 2017 license
It's hard to determine a second place among the paid programs. But Avast's full-scan slowdown was the heaviest at 53%, while AVG's was less than half that at 25%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c64a/0c64a4eb7d150aeb8442379f9c820a84458107f7" alt="webroot vs kaspersky 2017 webroot vs kaspersky 2017"
Likewise, Avast Free Antivirus (4.4%) had less of a background impact than its sibling AVG AntiVirus Free, (5.2%). You wouldn't notice ESET's 12% hit unless you were intensively using the processor already. You'd probably notice that full-scan slowdown even if you were just checking email.
#Webroot vs kaspersky 2017 full
But McAfee's full scan hit our test laptop like a ton of bricks, slowing it down by 96%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f317d/f317daebb0ade42cdeba1f745cb1628262cd7705" alt="webroot vs kaspersky 2017 webroot vs kaspersky 2017"
For example, McAfee Total Protection had a relatively light background impact, slowing down the Lenovo laptop by only 9% after installation. Most other programs were less consistent in their rankings. Kaspersky Security Cloud Free's full-scan system impact was a barely noticeable 6% its quick-scan impact was a barely measurable 1%. It actually sped up the system a bit after installation, indicating that it may be more efficient than the built-in Microsoft Defender Antivirus, which runs by default but deactivates itself if a third-party antivirus program is installed. Kaspersky Security Cloud Free was the undisputed winner in the free categories, beating all rivals in passive, full-scan and quick-scan impacts. Kaspersky did have the second-lightest full-scan impact in the bunch, however. The lightest quick-scan impact among paid programs was held by Kaspersky Total Security at 22%, a percentage that was nearly twice as much as ESET's full-scan impact. That may be because ESET doesn't have a quick-scan option.
#Webroot vs kaspersky 2017 install
Requires Specialist Skills To Install And UseĪdvanced (Combining IT Security And IT Efficiency).Requires Dedicated Server To Host Your Security Center.Select (Agile Cyber Security For Businesses Of Any Size) Mobile Device And Applications Management.Small Business – (1-50 Employees – Small Business IT Security)Ĭloud (Strong On Protection. Home Products (Home IT Security And Mobile Security)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8110/a81101101956b63906a2c5afc4f0b59a2f813d3c" alt="webroot vs kaspersky 2017 webroot vs kaspersky 2017"
Please visit Kasperky Lab’s official website to check the rates for its SMB pricing plans. It also has an enterprise pricing plan for large organizations.
#Webroot vs kaspersky 2017 license
The plans can be availed by purchasing a license which pricing is calculated based on the specific product you need, the number of desktops you have, and the number of years your license will be valid. Alongside its free version, Kaspersky Lab offers several SMB pricing plans for users to choose from.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72697/726973876b01628c86a420f8317caf74b7176ba0" alt="Webroot vs kaspersky 2017"